Popular

Tron Foundation partner sought U.S. trademarks but Disney pushed back and won

advertisement

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office last month rejected three trademark applications sought in connection with the cryptocurrency platform Tron after American media giant Disney filed notices of opposition and argued that approval would lead to brand confusion.

Tron Foundation’s China partner Raybo Technology first filed its requests to trademark “TRON,” “TRONNETWORK,” and “TRONIX in February 2018. When Disney pushed back with formal filings in August, Raybo Technology failed to respond, and the USPTO found in favor of Disney.

Thus, Raybo's applications were rendered abandoned in the first weeks of November. Crypto outlet Decrypt first reported the news Friday.

In its notices of opposition, Disney contended that the proposed trademarks would infringe on the corporation’s long history of using and licensing its film series of the same name. Indeed, Disney has built a whole franchise around its 1982 film TRON, including a sequel movie, an animated TV series, video games, musical recordings as well as a line of merchandise.

Disney highlights the fact that the Tron Foundation has chosen to present its name in all capital letters, which is highly similar to Disney’s own TRON marks. This move shows “bad faith” on Tron Foundation’s part, the notice says, and will likely confuse Disney’s long-standing customer base. 

Tron Foundation did not issue any response to Disney’s notice in the following nine months. As a result, the patent office rejected all three of its trademark applications by default, according to filings from November.

Records show that Raybo Technology already owns nine trademarks in China, including the words “Tron,” “TRX,” and “Tronix,” with more pending approval. 

“Tron clearly didn't take the trademark registration process seriously,” Jake Chervinsky, general counsel for Compound, told Decrypt. “They never hired U.S. counsel to represent them, even though the USPTO explicitly ordered them to do so. They also didn't respond to the USPTO's notice of default, meaning they gave up on their trademark attempt completely.”

“There's nothing wrong with deciding to abandon a trademark application when confronted with a vigorous defense like the one Disney was clearly prepared to mount,” Chervinsky continued. “But the respectful way to handle this situation is to withdraw the application, not to simply ignore the USPTO.”


© 2021 The Block Crypto, Inc. All Rights Reserved. This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Trending Stories

Get Your Crypto
Daily Brief

Delivered daily, straight to your inbox.

SEC said to allow first bitcoin futures ETF to trade in US: report

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission is said to be allowing the first Bitcoin futures exchange-traded fund (ETF), per a Bloomberg report. The publication said in a report on Thursday night that the U.S. regulator “isn’t likely to block the products from starting to trade next week,” citing people familiar with the matter. The report […]
Read Full Story
Oct 15, 2021, 2:54AM UTC
More