Australia, Malaysia, Singapore and South Africa will test cross-border CBDCs
September 2, 2021, 12:00AM EDT
1 min read
As part of the Bank for International Settlements' new Project Dunbar, the central banks of Australia, Malaysia, Singapore and South Africa are working to build prototype platforms for cross-border central bank digital currencies (CBDCs).
The news comes from a Bank for International Settlements announcement on September 2. The announcement describes the prototypes as such:
"These multi-CBDC platforms will allow financial institutions to transact directly with each other in the digital currencies issued by participating central banks, eliminating the need for intermediaries and cutting the time and cost of transactions."
Singapore's BIS Innovation Hub will spearhead the project. As described, the prototypes will function exclusively in wholesale, institutional applications rather than retail use. The BIS's representatives did not return The Block's request for clarification on the matter.
The end goals are much the same as any use case for wholesale CBDCs: quicker settlement time on cross-border payments without current frictions. It's become a central interest for the BIS in recent years.
Historically, the BIS has served as "the central bank for central banks," a role that has radically changed since its founding in 1930. New technologies like CBDCs are obviously of interest to that mission, but not all are confident in a CBDC's ability to improve on other upgrades to legacy payments systems like SWIFT.
LMAX Group robust technology and familiar institutional grade trading infrastructure (currently processing over 2 billion orders per day in the global FX market) is the solid backbone of LMAX Digital, delivering access to deep institutional liquidity, transparent price discovery, a regulated trading environment and a full custodian trading solution.
The Block Research was commissioned by Algorand to create Layer-1 Platforms: A Framework for comparison, which provides a “look under the hood” at seven platforms: Algorand, Avalanche, Binance Smart Chain, Cosmos, Ethereum/Ethereum 2.0, Polkadot, and Solana.
We assess their technical design, related ecosystem data, and qualitative factors such as key ecosystem members to get an understanding of how they differ. Having done this analysis, we draw some insights for what the future of the broader smart contract landscape could look like for years to come.